Sat May 3, 2008. Losing Ten Inches Ain't Fun!

Last Saturday Richard Navarrete convinced me to ignore my instincts, and meet him at Henry Coe State Park with our 18" Dobs. The plan was to see how it went, prepare to stay the night, but be ready to bail out if conditions were poor.

Well, they were. Driving down 101 looking toward Fremont Peak from around the Coyote Valley, well, there was no Fremont Peak. A low mucky haze covered everything. If I didn't know better, I'd swear we were back in fire season, it looked like we were smoked out. I arrived at Coe before Richard, and was pleased to see Jim Collins there. Hadn't seen him in ages, as he had moved to Chico a year back. Good to see you Jim! At the time, a stiff wind was a worry. It was chilly too. And, did I say it was mucky looking? Well, it was mucky looking. Richard arrived, his usual upbeat self. I had a hard time remaining glum about the prospects.

Sunset was spectacular. It was then that I realized a good observing night is a great thing, but even getting out and seeing a view like that sunset was worth the drive. I was feeling good again. Thanks Richard! I hope those reading this looked at the photo Richard posted on the TAC Flickr account, quite good, giving a nice feel for what it was like there.

Reading the other observing reports that have come in, the few of them, its clear that it wasn't, clear. The only place that oddly did well was Fremont Peak - and there's Jamie popping his buttons about it. Phooey Jamie. I'm happy for you, and Rich, and my long lost bud Rod, but it didn't help me feel better ;-) When I read your report, I could only think of one of my favorite lines in "Oh Brother Where Art Thou" - - - when Clooney can't get his Dapper Dan, and tells the store owner that his place is some sort of geographical oddity - its 2 weeks from everywhere! Well, that was Fremont Peak I guess. The oddity of observing sites last Saturday - a good one! I do see Steve got in some good observing too. Well, not me.

As Richard stated, our 18's were more like 8's out there. For sure, losing ten inches ain't fun. What frustration! But I did log some targets, and had fun with the rest of the gang there. Hawley had brought a new imaging gizmo, which looked quite slick. I met Marcel and Janet (is that right, Janet?). Scott Baker was fun to be set up by. He took my imaging ribbing right in stride. Anyway, all in all, it was fun, even with the frustration. We packed up and headed home about 12:30. Enough rest to enjoy the Lakers game and not enjoy the Sharks game (marathon) on Sunday.

By the way, Richard and I took a short hike to pay our fees at the ranger station at Coe. Very nice little hike. A few wildflower, mosses, lichens, all sorts of cool stuff to look at, and a bit of exercise. Try it next time!

Here are the few raw notes I logged from Saturday. You'll get the idea:

N5585 Uma GX 6.1'x3.8' 11.2B 14 19 47 56 43 45
Very large, very dim, elongated n/s. No detail in bad sky.

N5443 Uma GX 3.2'x1.2' 13.1P 14 02 11 55 48 56
Nice elongated galaxy ne/sw, appears mottled or ragged, almost as if there is a double core, 7mm, poor transparency. Actual core is large, fat, and has hint of stellar nucleus.

N5485 Uma GX 2.4'x1.8' 11.4V 14 07 11 55 00 05
Round galaxy, fairly small, dim halo with smallish brighter core and dim stellar nucleus, 12mm. With 7mm, hints of elongation n/s and some mottling, possible spiral structure noted to N of core.

NGC 5473 Uma GX 2.3'x1.8' 12.4B 14 04 43 54 53 35
Round disk of a possible small face on spiral, dim halo, small brighter core with bright stellar nucleus popping in averted.

N5687 Boo GX 2.4'x1.6' 12.6B 14 34 52 54 28 35
Small, elongated wwnw/eese, dim, brightish core, potentially a dim stellar nucleus. Nice galaxy with foreground stars embedded in leading edge.

NGC 5474 Uma GX 4.7'x4.7' 11.3B 14 05 01 53 39 38
Roundish or slightly irregular, mottled appearance, little to no detail? Offset core?

After a while, I began losing interest. Fortunately, Judy (Julie?) asked me to show her some constellations. Scott had a green laser (woooo!) that he lent me, so I was off and running, drawing lines in the sky. Hawley came over saying he was shooting wide-field where I had just begun to move too, so I put gave the laser back and we moved to the eyepiece.

M13 was way muted, but Julie and Marcel enjoyed it anyway. Same for M92. The one surprise of the night was M51, with a 12 Nagler, up high. Decent detail.

I think that's what I closed the night with. I don't know if others stayed much later, but the Clear Sky "Charts" indicated a worsening of transparency around 1 a.m., and I just wasn't into seeing how correct it might be.

Looking forward to next time. I can only get better, and I'd dearly love those ten inches back!

Sleepy Time Report from Willow Springs.

Saturday night I joined Steve Gottlieb for an observing session hosted by Kevin Ritschel at his property at Willow Springs. The drive down was a snap, very little traffic, just the occasional Sunday Driver going too slow (for me) on the two lane roads. Spring was just starting to pass "peak" as the green grasses carpeting the hills was just beginning to brown. It was still a spectacular ride, well worth the hour and forty minutes from downtown San Jose. I was a bit concerned about wind, as it was blowing hard in Morgan Hill when I stopped to top off the gas tank. But it was quite calm, and in the low 80's when I arrived just before 7 p.m. Conditions looked great.

The first view of the night was Saturn. I used it to align my finders, enjoying the confusion having it next to Regulus causes. Saturn looks just slightly brighter the Regulus, and the color differences between the two is easily seen. I was also confused by Mars being up in Gemini. Having not been out much over the last few months, the planets really throw a monkey-wrench into the sky, as I know it. The view of Saturn was very steady and showed lots of detail. Mars was lower and softer, although I felt at times I could "feel" a whiter area on it.

I had a list of objects that included some Herschel 400 and 400-II, Arp, Abell planetary and Hickson targets. I did not get through most of them, as my (stinking) laptop once again crapped out.... I think the adapter is flaky. I resorted to Uranometria and SA2000, but it is awkward after years of star hopping in the eyepiece, which is a luxury the computer as an atlas provides. So instead, I teamed up with Steve, letting the GoTo on his Starmaster find the targets, and I'd then look through his Telrad. We selected targets off my list that appeared interesting.

Additionally, we enjoyed some very good views through Kevin's behemoth 33.25" f/5 Dob.

Views of the night....

Kevin pulled in the NGC 2686 group in Ursa Major. At first just the brightest "3" galaxies were seen. But given some time for the dimmer ones to start popping, a total of 8 were seen. Of those, 7 are part of the group. How this one is not a Hickson is hard to understand. Look at your planetarium program to see how tight this group is. Observed NGC 2684, 2686A and B, 2687A and B, 2688, 2689 and MAC 0855+4906. Only the MAC was not seen in an 18".

The Ringtail Galaxy, NGCs 4038 and 4039, were also quite interesting in the 33. This is the first time I've seen 4038 as annular, and 4039 clearly trailing away. The "shrimp" shape of 4038 was obvious, and the darkened inner portion looked rough, or scalloped. The best I'd ever seen on this pair before was the typical hazy glow that most galaxies exhibit. Aperture rules!

Views of M99, M51 and M83 through the 33 also revealed outstanding detail. M99's odd shape and the sharp turned back arms off M83's big bar were very cool.

In the 18's, I think the most rewarding views were of:

NGC 5308 - 12mm - bright compact core with nearly stellar nucleus, long extended edge-on arms e/w.

NGC 5322 - 12mm - bright compact core with nearly stellar nucleus, slightly elongated e/w but mostly roundish, star overlaying outer halo on south edge.

NGC 5430 - odd, almost bifurcated on the south side of a north/south elongation. Disrupted galaxy. Perhaps two cores, brighter but not bright, with averted vision.

As the night wore on, I kept noticing an aroma I could not identify. Spearmint? Wintergreen? It was everywhere, and pungent. I was really pleasing, and lent an "aroma therapy" feel to the evening... I eventually asked Kevin what was going on. Well, the Spring carpet underfoot turned out to be Camomile. Like in the tea, good for relaxing, supposedly helps with insomnia. I absolutely felt all mellowed out... kind of a sleepy time observing session...

A few other views....

NGC 5585 - 12mm - bright, large, diffuse. Had a bright middle but no distinct core. Possibly a face on spiral.

NGC 5631 - small, bright, had a non-stellar core centered in a diffuse roundish halo. NGC 5480/5481- 5480 is elongated NW/SE with a large bright core, no nucleus, and surrounded by a small dimmer outer halo. 5481 in contrast has almost no core, but a bright stellar nucleus. It is slightly smaller than 5480, and seems dimmer as its round outer halo makes up much more of the galaxy.

NGC 5485 - bright and round with a bright non-stellar core. There are other galaxies close by to the N, SSE and further to the WSW.

NGC 5474 - what an odd galaxy! Large, but at first I only noticed a brighter and dimmer "half". Turned out the dimmer part was much larger than I initially thought. There is a bright "core" on the north side of this one, with the larger dim "oval" extending away to the south. Worth a look!

The last object I looked at was NGC5395, aka Arp 84. This is another unusual object. I sketched it and Steve showed me a photo in the Night Sky Observers Guide, which was virtually identical to my drawing. The main galaxy, 5395, is largish, but seems to have a central brighter section offset along its major axis. The dimmer part of the galaxy appeared to "splay" away from the brighter section, possibly interacting with the smaller and dimmer NGC 5394. The splay off the bigger brighter galaxy appeared to contact the smaller one. It was a very interesting object.

We looked at other targets as well, but by about 1 a.m. or so the sky was getting pretty well clouded over, and we were all certain that even the "clear" sections were actually covered by thin cloud. So, we called it a night.

It was well worth the trip time down to Willow. Good company, a huge scope, and fun target list. By the time I climbed into my truck to grab some sleep, the Camomile had done its job. I hadn't had such a good night's sleep in ages!

Eclipse - 3 Views?

Location: Slow lane, eastbound Highway 280 approaching 7th Street, San Jose.

5:55 p.m. It appeared there was a cloud in front of half the full moon. Traffic slowed to a crawl. Then I realized it was not a cloud. Half the moon was in fuzzy-edged darkness. Is this why cars were almost stopped on the freeway? The eclipse was underway. The nice curved edge of the shadow was the give-away that it was not just a cloud. Nice view. Wish I could have parked there.

Location: Aikido Dojo, Martha and 5th streets, San Jose
7:15 p.m. Looked out east facing windows of second floor of building, hands cupped around face pressed against the glass. Others asked what I was doing. Moon was barely visible in clouds as mushy oblate glow. However, ruddy rusty color was still obvious.

Location: Home, downtown SJ
8:00 p.m. Clouds. Lots of them. No moon visible.

All in all.... better than nothing!